From: Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
Subject: Re: So???
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!news.datemas.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
Subject: Re: So???
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 14:08:28 -0800
Organization: Datemas.de http://www.news.datemas.de
Message-ID: <ovsjrf$sgd$1@news.datemas.de>
References: <db6cb452-b12e-4482-8148-8a98b448b3d4@googlegroups.com>
<ovs9i7$11dh$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ovsasb$d3q$1@news.datemas.de>
<ovsjm8$1h9r$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 22:07:44 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.datemas.de;
logging-data="29197"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@datemas.de"; x-trace=DnBGgLPklqhdClsirvcnjrsSsyuSpxbe1f/Nsp67tWxeEpIfZqfQld2ATttz/xRo7unokOl8NTTRukV97kqw+LfUGNvZuECEFUa1jx3NNmV+dmVjFBvUH4/1GVMB5Mr/d5ybBdO29AFHvVsEB86iB5c+/LP4c6x8
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
In-Reply-To: <ovsjm8$1h9r$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2017-12-01 2:04 PM, Moderate wrote:
> Alan Baker<alangbaker@telus.net> Wrote in message:
>> On 2017-12-01 11:12 AM, Moderate wrote:
>>> Dene<gdstrue@aol.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>
>>>> President-ELECT may have directed Flynn to talk to the Russians. So....?!  What does this have
to do with the election???
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are you a little anxious?
>>>
>>> It has nothing to do with the election.  Flynn plead guilty for
>>>    the same reason that Trump fired him.
>>>
>>
>> Ummmm... ...no.
>>
>> Flynn pleaded guilty because they had him dead to rights...
>>
>> ...on much more than just that.
>>
>> That's why his plea agreement requires him to cooperate with the ongoing
>> investigation.
>>
>> :-)
>>
>    
> 
> Generally a cooperating witness is charged with the same scheme
>   the principle is accused of.  The idea is for prosecutors to
>   build the case by questioning the witness to explain the scheme
>   and implicate the principle.

Ummmm... ...no.

> 
> That isn't happening, because there is no scheme.
> 
> Q. "What were you charged with?"
> 
> A. "Lying"
> 
> Q. "Why are you here?"
> 
> A. "To tell the truth."
> 
> Send how your moronic scenario plays out?
> 

Keep whistling in the dark, doofus!