Subject: Re: So???
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id b8mr4116573itj.35.1512241712535;
Sat, 02 Dec 2017 11:08:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id d1mr424194oth.13.1512241712387; Sat,
02 Dec 2017 11:08:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 11:08:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=2002:47fb:28c9:e472:50dc:58c4:195c:e000;
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2002:47fb:28c9:e472:50dc:58c4:195c:e000
References: <>
<ovsq3k$qmg$> <>
<ovsu8l$e33$> <>
<> <>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: So???
From: -hh <>
Injection-Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 19:08:32 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 9
Print Article
Forward Article
Greg wrote:
> I believe then and now that there will be no indictment related to collusion. 

"...related to collusion"?   I don't have time to cross-check this right now:  
did Greg's original statement specifically narrow to collusion, or is this a 
subtle goal post move attempt?  Similarly, if it was there prior, did it specify 
only collusion with no less than certified Russian State actors, or was it
just any old kind of collusion (Russian or otherwise)?