From: Moderate <>
Subject: Re: So???
Full headers:
From: Moderate <>
Subject: Re: So???
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 14:14:39 -0600 (CST)
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <ovv1jf$18vh$>
References: <> <ovsq3k$qmg$> <> <ovsu8l$e33$> <> <> <> <> <ovuv5a$5k6$>
NNTP-Posting-Host: PEzmBAqM/Fdwr5/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: PiaoHong.Usenet.Client.VIP:1.65
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Print Article
Forward Article
Alan Baker<> Wrote in message:
> On 2017-12-02 11:08 AM, -hh wrote:
>> Greg wrote:
>>> I believe then and now that there will be no indictment related to collusion.
>> "...related to collusion"?   I don't have time to cross-check this right now:
>> did Greg's original statement specifically narrow to collusion, or is this a
>> subtle goal post move attempt?  Similarly, if it was there prior, did it specify
>> only collusion with no less than certified Russian State actors, or was it
>> just any old kind of collusion (Russian or otherwise)?
>> -hh
> Of course it's a goalpost move.
> Greg's a weasel who doesn't feel he actually needs to be accountable for 
> the things he says.
> No wonder he loves Trump: it validates him.