From: Alan Baker <>
Subject: Re: Flynn
Full headers:
From: Alan Baker <>
Subject: Re: Flynn
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 09:48:58 -0800
Message-ID: <p041qa$ob8$>
References: <ovros3$14t$> <>
<ovu9hm$h00$> <ovv53b$1nce$>
<ovvbhi$5ub$> <ovvcep$jcr$>
<> <p03nu9$pfd$>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:48:59 +0000 (UTC)
logging-data="24936"; mail-complaints-to=""; x-trace=Y0SW5wInBGIwkBLAZgYOMZlTSTRLWqYDdCXgBukt2wufCCI4Kvtqn5xRrI4ZC3Zd3KM34W0uNhR4qDSkO+B9M8jS5jyt+deGt8DRPgMWCTEx0h3Di7aXf6q2+uo6J6+Ipg8Q3WVOWlS1O9XiZfuLn5Ae4iPpdfS7
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <p040j1$19m3$>
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2017-12-04 9:28 AM, MNMikeW wrote:
> MNMikeW wrote:
>> DumbedDownUSA wrote:
>>> Alan Baker wrote:
>>>> On 2017-12-02 3:19 PM, Moderate wrote:
>>>>> Alan Baker<> Wrote in message:
>>>>>> On 2017-12-02 1:14 PM, Moderate wrote:
>>>>>>>> Flynn wouldn't have entered a plea agreement if this was all
>>>>>>>> Mueller had on him. But of course immoderate is too stupid to
>>>>>>>> even consider that possibility, as obvious as it is.
>>>>>>> Bwaahaahaa.
>>>>>>> It is over. Prosecutors have discretion. They used them. Zip,
>>>>>>> nada. Idiots are waiting for the other shoe to drop. It is
>>>>>>> over.
>>>>>> Do you want to make a small wager on that?
>>>>>> :-)
>>>>> I want to make a $3500 wager on that.
>>>> So you can welch?
>>> Well you can't have it both ways. You asked the biggest liar on the
>>> group if he'd like to make a wager... and he called your bluff knowing
>>> that it means nothing to do so as he has no honour.
>> Is Baker going to make a video of him counting out the $3500 he sends to
>> Mod? LOL!
> "By hiding from Congress, and from the American people, documented 
> political bias by a key FBI head investigator for both the Russia 
> collusion probe and the Clinton email investigation, the FBI and DOJ 
> engaged in a willful attempt to thwart Congress' constitutional 
> oversight responsibility," Nunes said in a statement Saturday afternoon. 
> "This is part of a months-long pattern by the DOJ and FBI of 
> stonewalling and obstructing this committee's oversight work, 
> particularly oversight of their use of the Steele dossier. At this 
> point, these agencies should be investigating themselves."
> "The DOJ has now expressed -- on a Saturday, just hours after the press 
> reports on Strzok's dismissal appeared -- a sudden willingness to comply 
> with some of the committee's long-standing demands," Nunes said in the 
> statement. "This attempted 11th-hour accommodation is neither credible 
> nor believable, and in fact is yet another example of the DOJ's 
> disingenuousness and obstruction."

Wow. A statement from the guy who had to recuse himself from the 
investigation because he was breaking the rules and working for Trump, 
not the committee?