From: Alan Baker <>
Subject: Re: OT: They all agree: obstructing justice is wrong...
Full headers:
From: Alan Baker <>
Subject: Re: OT: They all agree: obstructing justice is wrong...
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:45:07 -0800
Message-ID: <p04mm3$pc9$>
References: <p04k3i$nn4$>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 23:45:08 +0000 (UTC)
logging-data="25993"; mail-complaints-to=""; x-trace=GCUG1md1WezffFduc4Qz5nO+ydzm73/GbER3IMZyDJPnQtSmYrHo8L6xsANC34E/o368AOa9CauFLYzrpKmisaa76nEP6gMOixsr5ZCLzaWKfi9hwU0VBzojASHY2QMBtCISWli6WxZxvwJN0PZYrq1FkKAmOqDo
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <>
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2017-12-04 3:40 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:01:57 -0800, Alan Baker<>
> wrote:
>> '[the] Senator said, “The facts are disturbing and compelling on the
>> President's intent to obstruct justice."'
>> '[he also] said, “The chief law officer of the land, whose oath of
>> office calls on him to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution,
>> crossed the line and failed to defend the law, and, in fact, attacked
>> the law and the rights of a fellow citizen...Under our Constitution,
>> equal justice requires that he forfeit his office.”'
>> '[another] wholeheartedly agreed that obstruction of justice was a high
>> crime, saying that [the president] was "in violation of the federal
>> obstruction of justice law." He also expressed frustration with anyone
>> who disagreed. “I am completely and utterly perplexed by those who argue
>> that perjury and obstruction of justice are not high crimes and
>> misdemeanors,”'
>> <
>> Oh, did I fail to mention: this was when Clinton lied about getting a
>> blow-job. THAT was utterly critical to the nation.
>> 'Sessions wasn't just following the letter of the law - he was also
>> considering the importance of an ethical and moral compass that our
>> country must maintain. "Of course, none of us are perfect and we often
>> fail in our personal affairs, but when it comes to going to court, and
>> its comes to our justice system, a great nation must insist on honesty
>> and lawfulness...Our country must insist upon that for every citizen.”'
> Not all Alan.  There are several legal professors who disagree because
> of his constitutional right to voice an opinion.

I was referring to "all" as the Republicans who completely agreed when 
it was Clinton.

> It may not be illegal but its damn sure detrimental politically.

Instructing your FBI director to drop an investigation when you know 
there is grounds is not voicing an opinion.