From: BK <BK@Onramp.net>
Subject: Re: OT: They all agree: obstructing justice is wrong...
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: BK@Onramp.net
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
Subject: Re: OT: They all agree: obstructing justice is wrong...
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 10:18:31 -0600
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <i7hd2dhbhlkh11o2t9gpmpu33dfjisv7d6@4ax.com>
References: <p04k3i$nn4$1@news.datemas.de> <qvmb2ddlpd65sseug811dde6o4ht3ni9rh@4ax.com> <p068pj$njd$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net tzbHYUxrq4zLGc3vXaWocQ5EX9MWBzxIQzWwpfy9k7UXMCEDDm
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LX0+vTNmtqcbOEysnEt5pyjkflU=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Print Article
Forward Article
On Tue, 05 Dec 2017 08:00:19 -0600, MNMikeW<mnmiikkew@aol.com> wrote:

>BK@Onramp.net wrote:
<clip>
>> Not all Alan.  There are several legal professors who disagree because
>> of his constitutional right to voice an opinion.
>>
>> It may not be illegal but its damn sure detrimental politically.
>
>Is is Boingboing so....


I used the term in relationship to Trump's situation.  That usage
wouldn't fit a web site.