From: Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
Subject: Re: Trump has now spent more than a 3rd of his presidency at hisproperties and a 4th at his golf clubs
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!news.datemas.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
Subject: Re: Trump has now spent more than a 3rd of his presidency at his
properties and a 4th at his golf clubs
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 19:04:08 -0500
Organization: Datemas.de http://www.news.datemas.de
Message-ID: <p2ei9o$a4i$1@news.datemas.de>
References: <5423f0ab-e186-419e-9802-09c18a359291@googlegroups.com>
<p2bq3r$k1f$2@dont-email.me> <p2bqck$1muc$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<xn0l4ftyznfir4x000@news.eternal-september.org>
<p2djaj$1vh2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0l4g80enyjmkf003@nntp.aioe.org>
<600l4d175qahqf40v5l24mp7t2k68a8poi@4ax.com> <p2e2e0$obp$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<p2e3ju$5dp$2@news.datemas.de> <nu6l4d1gsbq9olfdje3435bf2qs7mghebt@4ax.com>
<p2e8ga$12ui$1@gioia.aioe.org> <p2ebno$qd3$3@news.datemas.de>
<o5gl4dtabu4ufc47c7mtu3p54vm0hvkts1@4ax.com> <p2eh53$1f8q$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 00:04:09 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.datemas.de;
logging-data="10386"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@datemas.de"; x-trace=ZqT496fGElYRrwj5VJbfzMxmQ0u0Qk8gVVgHKcgW0fvELJ57HIdg85PjujwSI96CJbbk5paavCelfmYd5TNFfb8sZBX4Z+Aju2Lns+OrzP87oi1L+ofb6indXpoAsTVmvqWAaXHC4hz0H8hxS49yAzUKynlAG1nn
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
In-Reply-To: <p2eh53$1f8q$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018-01-01 6:44 PM, Moderate wrote:
> BK@Onramp.net Wrote in message:
>> On Mon, 1 Jan 2018 17:12:08 -0500, Alan Baker<alangbaker@telus.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-01-01 4:16 PM, Moderate wrote:
>>>> BK@Onramp.net Wrote in message:
>>>>> On Mon, 1 Jan 2018 14:53:34 -0500, Alan Baker<alangbaker@telus.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2018-01-01 2:33 PM, Moderate wrote:
>>>>>>> BK@Onramp.net Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 1 Jan 2018 16:36:27 +0000 (UTC), "DumbedDownUSA"
>>>>>>>><dumb.america@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Moderate wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "DumbedDownUSA"<dumb.america@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>>>>> Moderate wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you hoping to make this canard true through sheer repetition?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Like collusion?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You are the one who brings up that subject daily; so you see how
>>>>>>>>>>> it's not like that at all?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You are consistently wrong about Trump.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You consistently have NOTHING of substance to offer in counter
>>>>>>>>>>> argument to the views expressed here.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You simply repeat meaningless mantras... which rather goes to Carbs
>>>>>>>>>>> point about Greg.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Collusion was all you idiots talked about.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's a lie.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nobody brings it up
>>>>>>>>>>     now besides me, because I won't let you lying fucks forget your
>>>>>>>>>>     lies.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What lies? You have my permission to talk about collusion in this
>>>>>>>>> context as long as you provide proof you are not simply lying.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You just called me a "lying fuck" about collusion. Provide some proof
>>>>>>>>> you fucked up retard or shut that pisshole of a gob of yours. You're
>>>>>>>>> just smelling the place out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There was no collusion.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That is not something you have a slightest clue about is it, doofus..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I wasn't aware the investigation was over and the report is in...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...if not then this is just another example of the shit you constantly
>>>>>>>>> invent.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Like saying there was no collusion.  Of course there was, but not by
>>>>>>>> Trump himself...(or not proven yet).  Moderate is a stupid asshole who
>>>>>>>> thinks he's bright and is consistently wrong. Manafort and Flynn
>>>>>>>> damned sure were colluding with the Russians and idiots like Moderate
>>>>>>>> don't let themselves believe it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DUMBASS says you never bring it up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Manafort and Flynn were not colluding.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then why were they lying about it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    The Dems colluded with
>>>>>>>     Russia
>>>>>>
>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to create a false document
>>>>>>
>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that was used by Dems to
>>>>>>>     wiretap Trump.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Remember how the Dems chucked when Trump said he was wire tapped?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yup. And it's still funny...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...because he wasn't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.factcheck.org/2017/09/revisiting-trumps-wiretap-tweets/
>>>>>
>>>>> Long read but here's three quotes from the article that tell the
>>>>> story.
>>>>>
>>>>> "There is still no evidence that Obama ordered wiretapping of Trump".
>>>>>
>>>>> "There is no evidence that any of Trump’s conversations were picked up
>>>>> by the FBI".
>>>>>
>>>>> "Incidental collection of information is legal with a FISA court
>>>>> order. Trump claimed that Obama was responsible for illegal
>>>>> Watergate-style wiretapping, but CNN wrote that the FISA court
>>>>> authorized the wiretapping of Manafort. That would make the incidental
>>>>> collection of information on Trump, or anyone else, perfectly legal".
>>>>> Nunes made the same point in March.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You cite CNN?
>>>>
>>>> Why not cite Aesop?
>>>>
>>> o
>>> Unable to face the facts, doofus?
>>
>> The resident idiot is unable to read too.
>> The site I quoted was NOT from CNN but from
>> factcheck.org as blatantly stated in the link.
>> They quoted CNN (and Nunes) as stating correctly that FISA authorized
>> the Manafort wiretap.
>>
>> Mod half-assed reading what was written as usual.
>> https://www.factcheck.org/2017/09/revisiting-trumps-wiretap-tweets/
>>
>> Long read but here's three quotes from the article that tell the
>> story.
>>
>> "There is still no evidence that Obama ordered wiretapping of Trump".
>>
>> "There is no evidence that any of Trump’s conversations were picked up
>> by the FBI".
>>
>> "Incidental collection of information is legal with a FISA court
>> order. Trump claimed that Obama was responsible for illegal
>> Watergate-style wiretapping, but CNN wrote that the FISA court
>> authorized the wiretapping of Manafort. That would make the incidental
>> collection of information on Trump, or anyone else, perfectly legal".
>> Nunes made the same point in March.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> Liar.
> 

Specifically, what bits are lies, and please provide your rebuttal sources.