From: Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
Subject: Re: Trump has now spent more than a 3rd of his presidency at hisproperties and a 4th at his golf clubs
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!news.datemas.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
Subject: Re: Trump has now spent more than a 3rd of his presidency at his
properties and a 4th at his golf clubs
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 09:14:16 -0500
Organization: Datemas.de http://www.news.datemas.de
Message-ID: <p2g43n$bvr$1@news.datemas.de>
References: <p2bqck$1muc$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<xn0l4ftyznfir4x000@news.eternal-september.org>
<p2djaj$1vh2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0l4g80enyjmkf003@nntp.aioe.org>
<600l4d175qahqf40v5l24mp7t2k68a8poi@4ax.com> <p2e2e0$obp$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<p2e3ju$5dp$2@news.datemas.de> <nu6l4d1gsbq9olfdje3435bf2qs7mghebt@4ax.com>
<p2e8ga$12ui$1@gioia.aioe.org> <p2ebno$qd3$3@news.datemas.de>
<o5gl4dtabu4ufc47c7mtu3p54vm0hvkts1@4ax.com> <p2eh53$1f8q$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<p2ei9o$a4i$1@news.datemas.de> <dqtl4d554mllis5bhqcdsme25bai83a8n7@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:14:15 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.datemas.de;
logging-data="12283"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@datemas.de"; x-trace=60zedi1JXiu9GFrBu6J4tWX81A4tzoWcKOyxXu7LoKgbuE78cDJEikBwKjCl8UweCrbiyLNpTOq/itoTkPkRcwM4BcJ4NBQ9dKgcuu8MEzrsKTRlpG96gukcTksaE7Skm9bXx8OcfRZfJAoUr/tuSRuXWdqQTGMn
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <dqtl4d554mllis5bhqcdsme25bai83a8n7@4ax.com>
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018-01-01 10:08 PM, BK@Onramp.net wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jan 2018 19:04:08 -0500, Alan Baker<alangbaker@telus.net>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-01-01 6:44 PM, Moderate wrote:
>>> BK@Onramp.net Wrote in message:
>>>> On Mon, 1 Jan 2018 17:12:08 -0500, Alan Baker<alangbaker@telus.net>
>>>> wrote:
> <clip>
>>>>>>>>>     The Dems colluded with
>>>>>>>>>      Russia
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> to create a false document
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> that was used by Dems to
>>>>>>>>>      wiretap Trump.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Remember how the Dems chucked when Trump said he was wire tapped?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yup. And it's still funny...
>>>>>>>> ...because he wasn't.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.factcheck.org/2017/09/revisiting-trumps-wiretap-tweets/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Long read but here's three quotes from the article that tell the
>>>>>>> story.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "There is still no evidence that Obama ordered wiretapping of Trump".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "There is no evidence that any of Trump’s conversations were picked up
>>>>>>> by the FBI".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Incidental collection of information is legal with a FISA court
>>>>>>> order. Trump claimed that Obama was responsible for illegal
>>>>>>> Watergate-style wiretapping, but CNN wrote that the FISA court
>>>>>>> authorized the wiretapping of Manafort. That would make the incidental
>>>>>>> collection of information on Trump, or anyone else, perfectly legal".
>>>>>>> Nunes made the same point in March.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You cite CNN?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why not cite Aesop?
>>>>>>
>>>>> o
>>>>> Unable to face the facts, doofus?
>>>>
>>>> The resident idiot is unable to read too.
>>>> The site I quoted was NOT from CNN but from
>>>> factcheck.org as blatantly stated in the link.
>>>> They quoted CNN (and Nunes) as stating correctly that FISA authorized
>>>> the Manafort wiretap.
>>>>
>>>> Mod half-assed reading what was written as usual.
>>>> https://www.factcheck.org/2017/09/revisiting-trumps-wiretap-tweets/
>>>>
>>>> Long read but here's three quotes from the article that tell the
>>>> story.
>>>>
>>>> "There is still no evidence that Obama ordered wiretapping of Trump".
>>>>
>>>> "There is no evidence that any of Trump’s conversations were picked up
>>>> by the FBI".
>>>>
>>>> "Incidental collection of information is legal with a FISA court
>>>> order. Trump claimed that Obama was responsible for illegal
>>>> Watergate-style wiretapping, but CNN wrote that the FISA court
>>>> authorized the wiretapping of Manafort. That would make the incidental
>>>> collection of information on Trump, or anyone else, perfectly legal".
>>>> Nunes made the same point in March".
>>>
>>> Liar.
> LOL
>>
>> Specifically, what bits are lies, and please provide your rebuttal sources.
> 
> He had to say something Alan and that one word is the full extent of
> his ability to think.  He has no rebuttal.
> 

I know... ...but I love watching him bluster.

:-)