From: Alan Baker <>
Subject: Re: The Memo for Dummies
Full headers:
From: Alan Baker <>
Subject: Re: The Memo for Dummies
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 15:03:49 -0500
Message-ID: <p554j5$e91$>
References: <p54kcf$1cfi$> <p54mc2$n5h$>
<p54rae$vku$> <p553kf$5kg$>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 20:03:49 +0000 (UTC)
logging-data="14625"; mail-complaints-to=""; x-trace=+vBPyrw6K8HCwvBoUYVRxOq+ZJugp/Rc8X5dJwhRP6YHVJtTcveFXuiQbFNdOrutYJPRmvglwEbOVGLji8E040IChmpI9GvAOeA/JR9ACCC4pUqVOf/GyvwLRj4yhfPbSG5HEypXOYRo82P9kFUgb1CXg/mFymvR
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <p553kf$5kg$>
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018-02-03 2:48 PM, Lord Butthurt wrote:
> On  3-Feb-2018, Alan Baker<> wrote:
>>> Tell us shitstain since your such an expert on everything Hillary and
>>> the
>>> DNC, why wouldn't Hillary and the DNC pay for a fake dossier to win an
>>> election?
>> That's not an argument that needs to be addressed.
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!.  It's exactly what the arguments about, you retarded
> shitstain.

No. It really isn't.

>>> If she was such a shoe in why did the DNC rig the primaries
>>> against Sanders?
>> Irrelevant.
> Nice avoidance, pussy.

Identification, not avoidance.