From: MNMikeW <>
Subject: Re: The Memo for Dummies
Full headers:
From: MNMikeW <>
Subject: Re: The Memo for Dummies
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:05:25 -0600
Organization: NNTP Server
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <p5a6d4$102j$>
References: <p54kcf$1cfi$> <p54mc2$n5h$> <p556cd$e91$> <p55p49$1ab2$> <p59u87$hrn$> <>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cpx9jteotT5ioY1IAj/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Firefox/10.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.7.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
Print Article
Forward Article
Dene wrote:
> On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 7:46:18 AM UTC-8, MNMikeW wrote:
>> Lord Butthurt wrote:
>>> On  3-Feb-2018, Alan Baker<>   wrote:
>>>>> On  3-Feb-2018, Alan Baker<>   wrote:
>>>>>>> I like how Dumbass never reads the memo, yet refutes everything
>>>>>>>      the FBI already confirmed.
>>>>>> Where has the FBI confirmed:
>>>>>> "FBI and DOJ know the dossier is fake and politically motivated."?
>>>>> James Comey testified to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence,
>>>>> June
>>>>> 8, 2017, the dossier was "salacious and unverified".
>>>> Neither of which is synonymous with "fake" or "politically motivated.
>>> Neither are they synonymous with "real" or "authenticated", you fucking
>>> retarded shitstain.
>> Yes, according to the Clueless Canadian, a dossier compiled against
>> Trump, by the Hillary campaign and the DNC could not possibly be
>> politically motivated.
> If Baker were an American, he would make a helluva Democrat.  No doubt he'd be fully employed in
their spin dept.

Like Baker would ever be fully employed. ;-)