From: MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>
Subject: Re: The Memo for Dummies
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
Subject: Re: The Memo for Dummies
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 12:10:57 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <p5cr3f$h9l$2@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <p54kcf$1cfi$1@gioia.aioe.org> <p54mc2$n5h$1@news.datemas.de> <p556cd$e91$2@news.datemas.de> <p55p49$1ab2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <p59u87$hrn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <p5cdv5$1odn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0l5w6kngpndrw000@news.eternal-september.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cpx9jteotT5ioY1IAj/y7Q.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Firefox/10.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.7.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
Print Article
Forward Article
DumbedDownUSA wrote:
> Moderate wrote:
>
>> MNMikeW<mnmiikkew@aol.com>  Wrote in message:
>>> Lord Butthurt wrote:
>>>> On  3-Feb-2018, Alan Baker<alangbaker@telus.net>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> On  3-Feb-2018, Alan Baker<alangbaker@telus.net>   wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I like how Dumbass never reads the memo, yet refutes everything
>>>>>>>>      the FBI already confirmed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where has the FBI confirmed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "FBI and DOJ know the dossier is fake and politically
>> motivated."?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> James Comey testified to the Senate Select Committee on
>> Intelligence,>>>>  June
>>>>>> 8, 2017, the dossier was "salacious and unverified".
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither of which is synonymous with "fake" or "politically
>> motivated.
>>>>
>>>> Neither are they synonymous with "real" or "authenticated", you
>> fucking>>  retarded shitstain.
>>>
>>> Yes, according to the Clueless Canadian, a dossier compiled against
>>> Trump, by the Hillary campaign and the DNC could not possibly be
>>> politically motivated.
>>>
>>
>> The stupidity of Libs goes beyond stupid to outright lies.
>
> Given that you are replying to a lie, that is quite ironic...
>

What lie is that?