From: MNMikeW <>
Subject: Re: Obamagate
Full headers:
From: MNMikeW <>
Subject: Re: Obamagate
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 13:43:01 -0600
Organization: NNTP Server
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <p5i984$18k4$>
References: <p5afua$1hv4$> <p5ah98$1k17$> <p5i41g$ka5$> <p5i753$14tb$>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cpx9jteotT5ioY1IAj/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Firefox/10.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.7.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
Print Article
Forward Article
Lord Butthurt wrote:
> On  8-Feb-2018, Alan Baker<>  wrote:
>>> If you had been paying attention, you would have noticed these.
>>> Leftist outrage over the Clinton email investigation
>> Rightly so.
>> They investigated it over and over and over...
>> ...and found nothing.
> Because 30,000 emails were deleted, blackberries destroyed and servers wiped
> clean....all after a subpoena had been served.

Not to mention the classified emails found on both her server and the 
ones she forwarded to Huma, found on Weiners laptop.

Baker is in denial they didn't find anything. The PARTISAN DOJ chose not 
to charge her with anything due to her upcoming coronation.
>> ...but you want to insist Comey was in collusion with the Democrats.
> Considering the FBI confirmed that James Comey drafted a letter exonerating
> Hillary Clinton long before investigation was complete....than yes, he was
> in collusion with them.

It's more than obvious. Don't forget, this exoneration letter was 
drafted BEFORE she was even interviewed.

> No wonder the shitstain is a college dropout.