From: Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
Subject: Re: Clinton Foundation Tax Return!!!!! WOW!!!!!
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
Subject: Re: Clinton Foundation Tax Return!!!!! WOW!!!!!
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 14:56:35 -0800
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <p7pqn1$mmk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <30de4568-38b7-4240-9703-f3d63954e58b@googlegroups.com>
<p7mn3i$1g3r$1@gioia.aioe.org> <p7nb50$c4e$1@dont-email.me>
<f30c9ea5-fdd7-4eba-a195-6c4bfcf48550@googlegroups.com>
<p7pql1$eg3$2@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mfLSWd2A/MSwip6jV+V+fg.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
Content-Language: en-US
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018-03-07 2:55 PM, Carbon wrote:
> On 03/07/2018 12:27 PM, Dene wrote:
>> On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 4:18:41 PM UTC-8, Carbon wrote:
>>> On 03/06/2018 01:36 PM, MNMikeW wrote:
>>>> michaelunowho@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> https://powderedwigsociety.com/clinton-foundation-tax-rtn/
>>>>>
>>>>> Total revenue (line 12)……………………… $177,804,612.00
>>>>>
>>>>> Total grants to charity (line 13)……….. $  5,160,385.00  (that’s less
>>>>> than 3%)
>>>>>
>>>>> Total expenses…………………………………… $  91,281,145.00
>>>>>
>>>>> Expenses include:
>>>>>
>>>>> Salaries (line 15)…………………………………..  $ 34,838,106.00
>>>>>
>>>>> Fund raising fees (line 16a)……………………  $      850,803.00
>>>>>
>>>>> Other expenses (line 17)………………………..  $ 50,431,851.00
>>>>>
>>>>> Travel………………………………………………….  $   8,000,000.00
>>>>>
>>>>> Meetings……………………………………………..  $ 12,000,000.00
>>>>>
>>>>> Golly!!!  They must have a very creative accountant!
>>>>>
>>>>> Or, it's aright wing site.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sure our resident little gas bag will explain it all to us.
>>>>
>>>> Not a slush fund, LOL!!!!
>>>    
>>> If you could point us to proof of wrongdoing, that would be great...
>>
>> You comfortable with a charitable outfit contributing 3% of revenue to
>> charity?
> 
> There isn't enough context provided with this return to make any sort of
> judgment about it. You know this as well as I do, or you should.
>   
> 

What I find most appalling about Greg and his ilk is that he DOES know 
that...

....but he'd rather be dishonest about it to serve his own interests.