From: Alan Baker <>
Subject: Re: Biased...maybe. True...absolutely
Full headers:
From: Alan Baker <>
Subject: Re: Biased...maybe. True...absolutely
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 13:05:42 -0800
Organization: NNTP Server
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <p7s8j4$qlf$>
References: <>
<p7r1tb$foj$> <p7rio2$1gcb$>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mfLSWd2A/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
Content-Language: en-US
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018-03-08 1:04 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 18:24:40 -0000 (UTC), "DumbedDownUSA"
><> wrote:
>> Dene wrote:
>>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 6:52:52 AM UTC-8, MNMikeW wrote:
>>>> Moderate wrote:
>>>>> Wrote in message:
>>>>>> This will be met with the usual denigration from some here.  The
>>>> same >> ones that deign to post tweets that are biased.  If this
>>>> will be read >> with an open mind it'll be clear that even though
>>>> it may be biased it >> is factual and there won't be one thing that
>>>> can be said is otherwise.
>>>>> Even Booby knows he needs to forewarn the
>>>>> reader that this opinion
>>>>>    piece is shit.
>>>>> Why would he even post it?  He is a mental defective.
>>>> And yet, he has a completely different view of opinion pieces we
>>>> post.  Gee, wonder why. Maybe if he only had an open mind.
> You have no idea of my view on your opinion pieces since they are
> mostly bullshit.  This one isn't and you can't point to an untruth.
>>> The subject line cracks me up.
>>> Biased truth.  What a concept.
>> That just shows the limitations of your intellect.
> It also proves again that his reading comprehension is poor.
> He completely missed the word "maybe" in the subject line.
> So the concept as written is perfectly fine.

He didn't miss it at all: he deliberately chose to exclude mention of it...

....because his selfish wants are more important to him than honesty.