From: MNMikeW <>
Subject: Re: Biased...maybe. True...absolutely
Full headers:
From: MNMikeW <>
Subject: Re: Biased...maybe. True...absolutely
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 15:09:54 -0600
Organization: NNTP Server
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <p7s8r0$s3l$>
References: <> <p7r1tb$foj$> <p7rio2$1gcb$> <> <> <>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cpx9jteotT5ioY1IAj/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Firefox/10.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.7.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
Print Article
Forward Article wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 18:24:40 -0000 (UTC), "DumbedDownUSA"
><>  wrote:
>> Dene wrote:
>>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 6:52:52 AM UTC-8, MNMikeW wrote:
>>>> Moderate wrote:
>>>>> Wrote in message:
>>>>>> This will be met with the usual denigration from some here.  The
>>>> same>>  ones that deign to post tweets that are biased.  If this
>>>> will be read>>  with an open mind it'll be clear that even though
>>>> it may be biased it>>  is factual and there won't be one thing that
>>>> can be said is otherwise.
>>>>> Even Booby knows he needs to forewarn the
>>>>> reader that this opinion
>>>>>    piece is shit.
>>>>> Why would he even post it?  He is a mental defective.
>>>> And yet, he has a completely different view of opinion pieces we
>>>> post.  Gee, wonder why. Maybe if he only had an open mind.
> You have no idea of my view on your opinion pieces since they are
> mostly bullshit.  This one isn't and you can't point to an untruth.

Sure I do. You comment on them all the time. It isn't bullshit in YOUR 
opinion. My opinion is entirely different. And seeing who wrote said 
opinion, I'm more than sure there are untruths in it.