From: BK <>
Subject: Re: Biased...maybe. True...absolutely
Full headers:
Subject: Re: Biased...maybe. True...absolutely
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 15:16:14 -0600
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <p7r1tb$foj$> <p7rio2$1gcb$> <> <> <> <p7s8r0$s3l$>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0tFWK1ydtBowCAHn3RD4ZnG+sms=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Print Article
Forward Article
On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 15:09:54 -0600, MNMikeW<> wrote:

> wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 18:24:40 -0000 (UTC), "DumbedDownUSA"
>><>  wrote:
>>> Dene wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 6:52:52 AM UTC-8, MNMikeW wrote:
>>>>> Moderate wrote:
>>>>>> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>> This will be met with the usual denigration from some here.  The
>>>>> same>>  ones that deign to post tweets that are biased.  If this
>>>>> will be read>>  with an open mind it'll be clear that even though
>>>>> it may be biased it>>  is factual and there won't be one thing that
>>>>> can be said is otherwise.
>>>>>> Even Booby knows he needs to forewarn the
>>>>>> reader that this opinion
>>>>>>    piece is shit.
>>>>>> Why would he even post it?  He is a mental defective.
>>>>> And yet, he has a completely different view of opinion pieces we
>>>>> post.  Gee, wonder why. Maybe if he only had an open mind.
>> You have no idea of my view on your opinion pieces since they are
>> mostly bullshit.  This one isn't and you can't point to an untruth.
>Sure I do. You comment on them all the time. It isn't bullshit in YOUR 
>opinion. My opinion is entirely different. And seeing who wrote said 
>opinion, I'm more than sure there are untruths in it.
LOL.  Then find them, which means you have to read it.