From: Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <constance@duxmail.com>
Subject: Re: So the Blue Team had a good night
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:34:54 -0600
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: "Con Reeder, unhyphenated American" <constance@duxmail.com>
Subject: Re: So the Blue Team had a good night
References: <305b1358-7650-4f4f-ad18-b0b046a40c49@googlegroups.com>
<4f237a52-8ffe-463b-8250-7969af7d1d8c@googlegroups.com>
<0ef6b5a4-ccfa-4daa-a585-d3c7c73160c3@googlegroups.com>
<60f69ec9-98a2-425e-be6c-49f39b017336@googlegroups.com>
<6083e899-2f71-4245-bfca-580490423852@googlegroups.com>
<slrnp07n3t.ims.constance@kim.perusion.com>
<eb5e4d1b-7583-4ee7-bb3e-dee0fa1a79b9@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: connie@duxmail.com
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.2-18 (Linux)
Message-ID: <slrnp0ai4e.1of.constance@kim.perusion.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:34:54 -0600
Lines: 22
X-Trace: sv3-jjvJqjnOOfXKg2xCr+nrfvLHEqY0sl6B7NSxh63Q2XkbE4tyllJ0PpxFhZf979vcPfE6tkguu0LhB1U!tMJ4QOOz/+3h807nmBlobST2XBEwuoaiERfjyrOgGL07QCRk1ZUeoq/RYYZKLI7J+sTapxpg665H!qKdA0kE=
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2470
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2017-11-09, xyzzy<xyzzy.dude@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 8, 2017 at 11:41:39 PM UTC-5, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:
>> On 2017-11-08, tim.vanwagonerspam@gmail.com <tim.vanwagonerspam@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Not worse than Gillespie's MS-13 ad. 
>> >
>> > https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wQbutJxWE0Y
>> 
>> Oh, it's worse, by far. It actually suggest Gillespie voters chase down
>> minority kids with cars. The MS-13 add attacks Northram's vote and says
>> it will "increase the threat". The two aren't even in the same ballpark.
>
> "Your side's attack ad is just dirty.  My side's attack ad is A-OK!"

I didn't say it was A-OK. It is a typical negative ad attacking an opponent -- disgusting
but pretty normal. Attacking the *voters* of the other party is something new and
something utterly repugnant. If you can find an example of that from the Republicans,
I will be happy to equate it to that.

-- 
That a few of us need to be more in touch with our feelings has obscured
a deep truth: many more folks need to be much less in touch with theirs.
-- Eric Weinstein