From: GrtArtiste <>
Subject: Re: one other good thing about the committee's seedings.....
Full headers:
From: GrtArtiste <>
Subject: Re: one other good thing about the committees seedings.....
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 05:34:53 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <p08h4e$c8l$>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 10:34:54 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:; posting-host="a6b7283e09f00147bec0feebbf24605a";
logging-data="12565"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19M7roRul+k8t4zN7VQkuHYn2AxMRrW+F0="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DDjvtjGbqYggTI7Btxr25D5Dhng=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/5/2017 5:42 PM, michael anderson wrote:
> they've given us essentially two 50/50 games(well Bama is 60/40 to beat clemson but close enough
right now)
> Past years havent given us that.  Remember the line on Bama-Washington last year?  Like -15 or
something crazy at kickoff. And the game was as bad as predicted.
> This year we truly dont know who will win either of the two semifinals.  Which makes for more
build up and excitement.

Clempsum-Bama being the late game works well for me since I won't be 
staying up late to watch it. If Clempsum wins, I won't care that I 
didn't see it. If Bama wins, I'll be glad I didn't see it.

On Jan 1 I'll be hoping that S. Carolina puts a whoopin' on scuM and 
that JawJuh RUTSes Boomer. The rest is just background noise.