Subject: Re: Question about Pittsburgh
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 2:34:11 PM UTC-6, michael anderson wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 2:26:18 PM UTC-6, JGibson wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 3:18:51 PM UTC-5, michael anderson wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 10:54:20 AM UTC-6, JGibson wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 11:47:07 AM UTC-5, Some dued wrote:
> > > > > According to http://www.winsipedia.com/pittsburgh they have 9 FBS National Championships,
but only 2 Conference championships. Did they used to be independent or something?
> > > >
> > > > Is this bait?
> > >
> > > ?? Why would it be? I don't think most football fans of today are familiar with the history
of a now marginal program which hasnt been relevant in some time. Even people a little older than
havent seen a time when pitt was relevant in their football watching life.
> > >
> > > Hell most people couldnt even tell you what division of the acc they are in now
> > I figured some dued was about my age or a little older. People used to the old eastern
independents in Pitt, Penn State, Boston College, West Virginia...
> but you are a big penn state fan who knows the history of them and their rivals pretty well Im
guessing. For people(even old enough to remember) other than penn state fans or wvu fans, pitt just
wouldnt be on the radar.
> Honestly out of all the power 5 teams now, they are definately in the bottom third in terms of
interest, fan base, and just the overall status of the program.
And yet they did something last season that even Alabama couldn't do.