Subject: Re: Here's an algorithm that says team #4 should have been Auburn
On Thursday, December 7, 2017 at 9:53:09 AM UTC-6, JGibson wrote:
> And just for unclejr:
> 11. Notre Dame
> 12. Stanford
> Then again, USC is all the way down at 17 which doesn't make any sense to me.
Cool beans. Thanks. And no, it doesn't make much sense that a team with a better record and
winning head-to-head twice vs Stanford would be behind by 5 positions.