Subject: Re: Here's an algorithm that says team #4 should have been Auburn
On Thursday, December 7, 2017 at 1:50:17 PM UTC-8, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:24:48 -0800 (PST), JGibson
> >On Thursday, December 7, 2017 at 12:19:24 PM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> >> On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 07:53:05 -0800 (PST), JGibson
> >><email@example.com> wrote:
> >> >https://www.footballoutsiders.com/fei-ratings/2017/fei-week-14-ratin...
> >> >
> >> >And just for unclejr:
> >> >11. Notre Dame
> >> >12. Stanford
> >> >
> >> >Then again, USC is all the way down at 17 which doesn't make any sense to me.
> >> Auburn and TOSU would have tied for 4th except for Iowa and UGA.
> >Conveniently for Alabama, they didn't play UGA while Auburn played UGA twice.
> I suspect Bama paid the SEC schedulers about 10 years ago to not
> schedule Bama to play UGA in 2017 - doncha think?
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
more like Auburn 26, Alabama 12