> Prev
From: tim.vanwagonerspam <tim.vanwagonerspam@gmail.com>
Subject: $1.1 trillion deficit... discuss
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id k67mr931390ith.7.1518099520052;
Thu, 08 Feb 2018 06:18:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id m17mr36152otf.11.1518099519851; Thu,
08 Feb 2018 06:18:39 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!newsgate.cuhk.edu.hk!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!w142no760988ita.0!news-out.google.com!k194ni2615itb.0!nntp.google.com!o66no761249ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 06:18:39 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:3:803:0:0:0:aa;
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:3:803:0:0:0:aa
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <27785550-b2d3-4b69-8913-9da1b729cd71@googlegroups.com>
Subject: $1.1 trillion deficit... discuss
From: tim.vanwagonerspam@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 14:18:40 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 10
Print Article
Forward Article
I know that the Republican dogma is traditionally anti-Keynesian, but that previously didn’t mean
cutting taxes and increasing government spending when the economy is already in danger of

So now we have a consistent pattern of Democratic Presidents inheriting large deficits and cutting
them dramatically over their terms followed by Republican Presidents immediately blowing those
deficits back up.  

As a squishy fiscal conservative, this just raises so much cognitive dissonance in me, I would love
to know how others are processing this.