From: Futbol Phan <sgzphd@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Patty Hearst Trivia Question
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.36.84.210 with SMTP id t201mr67542ita.35.1518115546887;
Thu, 08 Feb 2018 10:45:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.63.152 with SMTP id r24mr8684otc.0.1518115546756; Thu,
08 Feb 2018 10:45:46 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!o66no847181ita.0!news-out.google.com!s63ni1393itb.0!nntp.google.com!o66no847178ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:45:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <02b78b50-ef3e-442f-8320-9cbcfd3de9b5@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:1700:b350:6250:973:4a2b:74c3:3653;
posting-account=BwuRzQoAAAA_RrIk1IT5usgvM0qE7rZV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:1700:b350:6250:973:4a2b:74c3:3653
References: <aad51936-e051-45a1-b844-95c4cae94c70@googlegroups.com> <02b78b50-ef3e-442f-8320-9cbcfd3de9b5@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <a632a461-a37d-4158-8f66-3496129d8351@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Patty Hearst Trivia Question
From: Futbol Phan <sgzphd@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:45:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 15
Print Article
Forward Article
On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 12:20:42 PM UTC-6, xyzzy wrote:
> On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 12:59:17 PM UTC-5, Futbol Phan wrote:
> > So Patty Hearst served 22 months in prison and had the remaining 8 months of her sentence
commuted by Jimmy Carter.  Reagan reportedly considered a presidential pardon but decided against
it.  In 2000, Patty wrote a formal request for a presidential pardon from Clinton.  The US attorney
in California strongly objected, writing, "I strongly oppose the pardon application filed by
Patricia Hearst. The attitude of Hearst has always been that she is a person above the law and that,
based on her wealth and social position, she is not accountable for her conduct, despite the jury's
verdict." 
> > 
> > Name that US attorney
> 
> I'm sure it's nobody who ever amounted to anything.

In the eyes of about 38% of the population, yes.