> Prev
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: Did California pay for Tarantino's latest movie?
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.107.143.132 with SMTP id r126mr12562264iod.7.1512374996336;
Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:09:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.14.137 with SMTP id 9mr628484otj.14.1512374996135; Mon,
04 Dec 2017 00:09:56 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!i6no2562336itb.0!news-out.google.com!b73ni688ita.0!nntp.google.com!193no865201itr.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 00:09:55 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.95.0.172; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.95.0.172
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <795c4ee8-3e5c-47fa-a568-82123811d458@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Did California pay for Tarantinos latest movie?
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 08:09:56 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 3
Print Article
Forward Article
An $18M tax credit?

http://variety.com/2017/film/news/quentin-tarantino-manson-film-120... 

	
From: peterjcooperesq <peterjcooperesq@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantino's latest movie?
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.36.135.71 with SMTP id f68mr3462955ite.40.1512392239337;
Mon, 04 Dec 2017 04:57:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.85.67 with SMTP id h3mr656304oti.10.1512392239221; Mon,
04 Dec 2017 04:57:19 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!i6no2714392itb.0!news-out.google.com!s63ni3342itb.0!nntp.google.com!193no1015777itr.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 04:57:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <795c4ee8-3e5c-47fa-a568-82123811d458@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.103.168.213;
posting-account=06L0IwoAAADfLWWFvvooYl2ZxYdlDuE5
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.103.168.213
References: <795c4ee8-3e5c-47fa-a568-82123811d458@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3adcb4bc-5989-4237-ba08-121366cb5531@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantinos latest movie?
From: peterjcooperesq@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:57:19 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 5
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 3:09:59 AM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
> An $18M tax credit?
> 
> http://variety.com/2017/film/news/quentin-tarantino-manson-film-120...

$18 million would not even cover the costs for a Tarantino film's catering and Adderall budget 

	
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantino's latest movie?
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.36.179.69 with SMTP id z5mr9364410iti.52.1512433891650;
Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:31:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.1.175 with SMTP id e44mr734139ote.1.1512433890962; Mon,
04 Dec 2017 16:31:30 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!193no1434450itr.0!news-out.google.com!b73ni1349ita.0!nntp.google.com!193no1434447itr.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:31:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3adcb4bc-5989-4237-ba08-121366cb5531@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=184.75.212.3; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.75.212.3
References: <795c4ee8-3e5c-47fa-a568-82123811d458@googlegroups.com> <3adcb4bc-5989-4237-ba08-121366cb5531@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8bea7b51-e8ca-4bc6-9222-45ddeb1cb18b@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantinos latest movie?
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:31:31 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 8
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, 4 December 2017 07:57:22 UTC-5, peterjc...@gmail.com  wrote:
> On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 3:09:59 AM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
> > An $18M tax credit?
> > 
> > http://variety.com/2017/film/news/quentin-tarantino-manson-film-120...
> 
> $18 million would not even cover the costs for a Tarantino film's catering and Adderall budget

Facetiousness aside, they basically paid for his series.  I hope the tax-payers think it's worth it. 

	
From: peterjcooperesq <peterjcooperesq@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantino's latest movie?
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.107.8.26 with SMTP id 26mr15072665ioi.27.1512446434264;
Mon, 04 Dec 2017 20:00:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.33.82 with SMTP id l18mr753722otd.6.1512446434182; Mon,
04 Dec 2017 20:00:34 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!193no1528575itr.0!news-out.google.com!s63ni4063itb.0!nntp.google.com!193no1528571itr.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 20:00:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8bea7b51-e8ca-4bc6-9222-45ddeb1cb18b@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.103.168.213;
posting-account=06L0IwoAAADfLWWFvvooYl2ZxYdlDuE5
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.103.168.213
References: <795c4ee8-3e5c-47fa-a568-82123811d458@googlegroups.com>
<3adcb4bc-5989-4237-ba08-121366cb5531@googlegroups.com> <8bea7b51-e8ca-4bc6-9222-45ddeb1cb18b@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <474d1fe0-7ab6-4a7f-85ca-674f3a22a7d9@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantinos latest movie?
From: peterjcooperesq@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 04:00:34 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 11
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 7:31:34 PM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
> On Monday, 4 December 2017 07:57:22 UTC-5, peterjc...@gmail.com  wrote:
> > On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 3:09:59 AM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
> > > An $18M tax credit?
> > > 
> > > http://variety.com/2017/film/news/quentin-tarantino-manson-film-120...
> > 
> > $18 million would not even cover the costs for a Tarantino film's catering and Adderall budget
> 
> Facetiousness aside, they basically paid for his series.  I hope the tax-payers think it's worth
it.

Facetiousness aside, Tarantino's last film took place primarily in one large room and it cost $44
million to make. PS What series? 

	
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantino's latest movie?
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.36.122.81 with SMTP id a78mr11742058itc.4.1512518458794;
Tue, 05 Dec 2017 16:00:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.1.175 with SMTP id e44mr893675ote.1.1512518458697; Tue,
05 Dec 2017 16:00:58 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!193no2196418itr.0!news-out.google.com!b73ni2296ita.0!nntp.google.com!i6no3909499itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:00:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <474d1fe0-7ab6-4a7f-85ca-674f3a22a7d9@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.95.0.172; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.95.0.172
References: <795c4ee8-3e5c-47fa-a568-82123811d458@googlegroups.com>
<3adcb4bc-5989-4237-ba08-121366cb5531@googlegroups.com> <8bea7b51-e8ca-4bc6-9222-45ddeb1cb18b@googlegroups.com>
<474d1fe0-7ab6-4a7f-85ca-674f3a22a7d9@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d478b42a-f8dc-4c29-bc83-59bd162911b7@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantinos latest movie?
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:58 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2213
X-Received-Body-CRC: 599427568
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, 4 December 2017 23:00:37 UTC-5, peterjc...@gmail.com  wrote:
> On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 7:31:34 PM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
> > On Monday, 4 December 2017 07:57:22 UTC-5, peterjc...@gmail.com  wrote:
> > > On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 3:09:59 AM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
> > > > An $18M tax credit?
> > > > 
> > > > http://variety.com/2017/film/news/quentin-tarantino-manson-film-120...
> > > 
> > > $18 million would not even cover the costs for a Tarantino film's catering and Adderall budget
> > 
> > Facetiousness aside, they basically paid for his series.  I hope the tax-payers think it's worth
it.
> 
> Facetiousness aside, Tarantino's last film took place primarily in one large room and it cost $44
million to make. PS What series?

Sorry, "movie."  California gave away the farm though.  Where else was he going to film it but
California?  Let Vancouver stand-in for L.A.?? 

	
From: peterjcooperesq <peterjcooperesq@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantino's latest movie?
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.36.7.1 with SMTP id f1mr7870936itf.0.1512536322123;
Tue, 05 Dec 2017 20:58:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.32.78 with SMTP id n72mr912004ota.12.1512536322051; Tue,
05 Dec 2017 20:58:42 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!193no2325489itr.0!news-out.google.com!b73ni2559ita.0!nntp.google.com!i6no4039768itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 20:58:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <d478b42a-f8dc-4c29-bc83-59bd162911b7@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.103.168.213;
posting-account=06L0IwoAAADfLWWFvvooYl2ZxYdlDuE5
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.103.168.213
References: <795c4ee8-3e5c-47fa-a568-82123811d458@googlegroups.com>
<3adcb4bc-5989-4237-ba08-121366cb5531@googlegroups.com> <8bea7b51-e8ca-4bc6-9222-45ddeb1cb18b@googlegroups.com>
<474d1fe0-7ab6-4a7f-85ca-674f3a22a7d9@googlegroups.com> <d478b42a-f8dc-4c29-bc83-59bd162911b7@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f44c205d-5aed-4ee9-a6ea-0d05d1639000@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantinos latest movie?
From: peterjcooperesq@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 04:58:42 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 17
Print Article
Forward Article
On Tuesday, December 5, 2017 at 7:01:01 PM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
> On Monday, 4 December 2017 23:00:37 UTC-5, peterjc...@gmail.com  wrote:
> > On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 7:31:34 PM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
> > > On Monday, 4 December 2017 07:57:22 UTC-5, peterjc...@gmail.com  wrote:
> > > > On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 3:09:59 AM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
> > > > > An $18M tax credit?
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://variety.com/2017/film/news/quentin-tarantino-manson-film-120...
> > > > 
> > > > $18 million would not even cover the costs for a Tarantino film's catering and Adderall
budget
> > > 
> > > Facetiousness aside, they basically paid for his series.  I hope the tax-payers think it's
worth it.
> > 
> > Facetiousness aside, Tarantino's last film took place primarily in one large room and it cost
$44 million to make. PS What series?
> 
> Sorry, "movie."  

I figured -- I just wanted to make sure I did not miss something about the Tarantino project. 

	
From: hector <bobble@there.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantino's latest movie?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hector <bobble@there.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantinos latest movie?
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 00:23:02 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <p03i7u$mn6$1@dont-email.me>
References: <795c4ee8-3e5c-47fa-a568-82123811d458@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:23:11 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c6f25d34d64be1d6903ac50e4006703b";
logging-data="23270"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/JdZl/GCODy8JfLCHAXKaY"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.0.1
In-Reply-To: <795c4ee8-3e5c-47fa-a568-82123811d458@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:S+AmS0S8rSg4q63SDafW7q1WJXY=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 4/12/2017 7:09 PM, RichA wrote:
> An $18M tax credit?
> 
> http://variety.com/2017/film/news/quentin-tarantino-manson-film-120...
> 

The series Aquarius will come across as an accurate documentary compared 
to what Tarantino will fabricate. 

	
From: peterjcooperesq <peterjcooperesq@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantino's latest movie?
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.36.179.69 with SMTP id z5mr8230162iti.52.1512399789333;
Mon, 04 Dec 2017 07:03:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.69.72 with SMTP id p8mr670347oti.4.1512399789231; Mon,
04 Dec 2017 07:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!i6no2783915itb.0!news-out.google.com!s63ni3463itb.0!nntp.google.com!193no1085584itr.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 07:03:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <p03i7u$mn6$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.103.168.213;
posting-account=06L0IwoAAADfLWWFvvooYl2ZxYdlDuE5
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.103.168.213
References: <795c4ee8-3e5c-47fa-a568-82123811d458@googlegroups.com> <p03i7u$mn6$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e739ae0f-ef43-45e6-b732-5afc012d2949@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantinos latest movie?
From: peterjcooperesq@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 15:03:09 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 14
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 8:23:14 AM UTC-5, hector wrote:
> On 4/12/2017 7:09 PM, RichA wrote:
> > An $18M tax credit?
> > 
> > http://variety.com/2017/film/news/quentin-tarantino-manson-film-120...
> > 
> 
> The series Aquarius will come across as an accurate documentary compared 
> to what Tarantino will fabricate.


"The director has told media outlets that it’s not a biopic, but is an ensemble film set during
the tumultuous time period. " 

	
From: hector <bobble@there.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantino's latest movie?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hector <bobble@there.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantinos latest movie?
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 23:02:49 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <p061tj$jdu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <795c4ee8-3e5c-47fa-a568-82123811d458@googlegroups.com>
<p03i7u$mn6$1@dont-email.me>
<e739ae0f-ef43-45e6-b732-5afc012d2949@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:03:01 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8a295d25da1172823aad2f83b8600815";
logging-data="19902"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19LCU437wWie7nlHOzmuAan"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.0.1
In-Reply-To: <e739ae0f-ef43-45e6-b732-5afc012d2949@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pydHvG0wXU7dFyFNvKFHTNWsCXU=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 5/12/2017 2:03 AM, peterjcooperesq@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 8:23:14 AM UTC-5, hector wrote:
>> On 4/12/2017 7:09 PM, RichA wrote:
>>> An $18M tax credit?
>>>
>>> http://variety.com/2017/film/news/quentin-tarantino-manson-film-120...
>>>
>>
>> The series Aquarius will come across as an accurate documentary compared
>> to what Tarantino will fabricate.
> 
> 
> "The director has told media outlets that it’s not a biopic, but is an ensemble film set during
the tumultuous time period."
> 

It can go ensemble it's way to fuck off.  More like 'inspired by the 
tumultuous time period'.
'It's not a documentary' but it's too false to bear watching anyway. 

	
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantino's latest movie?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!kreme.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantinos latest movie?
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:39:19 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Miskatonic U
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <slrnp2b227.1rmd.g.kreme@snow.local>
References: <795c4ee8-3e5c-47fa-a568-82123811d458@googlegroups.com>
<p03i7u$mn6$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:39:19 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: kreme.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e00f8676f609cacf6a904a8476eb8c96";
logging-data="29395"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/n3yPE+MEMC2CnK2ish4vK"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (Darwin)
X-Face: )^b5"R:T7U>9~:PEn3YkzMfW*[b1qKeU.fP9C8~8HpU9}lA&6`bH1z
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8tO23obCoI88L3xk7ADi11LkPXk=
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Print Article
Forward Article
In message <p03i7u$mn6$1@dont-email.me> hector<bobble@there.com> wrote:
> On 4/12/2017 7:09 PM, RichA wrote:
>> An $18M tax credit?
>> 
>> http://variety.com/2017/film/news/quentin-tarantino-manson-film-120...

> The series Aquarius will come across as an accurate documentary compared 
> to what Tarantino will fabricate.

Is Tarantino making a documentary?


-- 
Varium et mutabile semper Femina. 

	
Next <
From: hector <bobble@there.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantino's latest movie?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hector <bobble@there.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantinos latest movie?
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 23:03:17 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <p061uf$jdu$2@dont-email.me>
References: <795c4ee8-3e5c-47fa-a568-82123811d458@googlegroups.com>
<p03i7u$mn6$1@dont-email.me> <slrnp2b227.1rmd.g.kreme@snow.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:03:29 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8a295d25da1172823aad2f83b8600815";
logging-data="19902"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+e63ro1GClQpEuQyT3thbz"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.0.1
In-Reply-To: <slrnp2b227.1rmd.g.kreme@snow.local>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:u5xWWoHm6mSxUHPdD+wmHUOJfTo=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 5/12/2017 4:39 AM, Lewis wrote:
> In message <p03i7u$mn6$1@dont-email.me> hector<bobble@there.com> wrote:
>> On 4/12/2017 7:09 PM, RichA wrote:
>>> An $18M tax credit?
>>>
>>> http://variety.com/2017/film/news/quentin-tarantino-manson-film-120...
> 
>> The series Aquarius will come across as an accurate documentary compared
>> to what Tarantino will fabricate.
> 
> Is Tarantino making a documentary?
> 
> 

No David Duchovny was in one by comparison.