> Prev
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: Was Bryan Signer canned as a pre-emptive strike?
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.36.50.22 with SMTP id j22mr265527ita.10.1512634773151;
Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:19:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.85.67 with SMTP id h3mr1091634oti.10.1512634772604; Thu,
07 Dec 2017 00:19:32 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!i6no4898161itb.0!news-out.google.com!s63ni6669itb.0!nntp.google.com!i6no4898156itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 00:19:32 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.95.0.172; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.95.0.172
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <7e65f177-1f3f-4357-8b0b-575acb67b658@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Was Bryan Signer canned as a pre-emptive strike?
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 08:19:32 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Body-CRC: 604937593
X-Received-Bytes: 1343
Print Article
Forward Article
His sordid reputation hints at it.  The idea that a studio might get rid of him to prevent any
problems with sexual impropriety interfering with their production isn't far-fetched.

http://www.imdb.com/news/ni61795533/?ref_=nv_nw_tn_1 

	
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
Subject: Re: Was Bryan Signer canned as a pre-emptive strike?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Was Bryan Signer canned as a pre-emptive strike?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
References: <7e65f177-1f3f-4357-8b0b-575acb67b658@googlegroups.com>
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7e65f177-1f3f-4357-8b0b-575acb67b658@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <5Y8WB.10022$po7.7269@fx10.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 10:44:17 UTC
Organization: http://www.NewsDemon.com
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 04:44:16 -0600
X-Received-Body-CRC: 93236014
X-Received-Bytes: 1324
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/7/17 2:19 AM, RichA wrote:
> His sordid reputation hints at it.  The idea that a studio might get rid of him to prevent any
problems with sexual impropriety interfering with their production isn't far-fetched.
> 
> http://www.imdb.com/news/ni61795533/?ref_=nv_nw_tn_1
> 

Have you ever tried reading an actual article?

https://screenrant.com/bohemian-rhapsody-movie-bryan-singer-fired/ 

	
Next <
From: Obveeus <Obveeus@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Was Bryan Signer canned as a pre-emptive strike?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Obveeus <Obveeus@aol.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Was Bryan Signer canned as a pre-emptive strike?
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:09:45 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <p0bi38$tci$3@dont-email.me>
References: <7e65f177-1f3f-4357-8b0b-575acb67b658@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:09:44 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6a94134624109bc7d69ec728b2a22545";
logging-data="30098"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+UBfzuGywZhyzxPr6jCm2l"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.5.0
In-Reply-To: <7e65f177-1f3f-4357-8b0b-575acb67b658@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fbcyQX8qkoyid/420uZurc7QaLs=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/7/2017 3:19 AM, RichA wrote:
> His sordid reputation hints at it.  The idea that a studio might get rid of him to prevent any
problems with sexual impropriety interfering with their production isn't far-fetched.
> 
> http://www.imdb.com/news/ni61795533/?ref_=nv_nw_tn_1

He was fired for lack of progress / lack of work...final straw.

Sometimes, people have to sacrifice work in order to deal with family 
illness.