> Prev
From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Subject: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.56.156 with SMTP id f28mr22244024qtc.15.1509135083596;
Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!z50no3518321qtj.0!news-out.google.com!v14ni1623qtc.0!nntp.google.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx07.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
Message-ID: <gd47vchqb9q66h9dtrqi8ej4452s6tpnt1@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 13
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 09:11:23 +1300
X-Received-Bytes: 1004
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4224044904
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 861
Print Article
Forward Article
.... except that I don't believe the claim about phototoshop. Well,
maybe they haven't touched them with Photoshop but in most cases I
believe they have been touched with something else.

http://giggag.com/post/32161

The point to me is that apart from anything else, they all are of
interesting subjects.
-- 

Regards,

Eric Stevens 

	
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:48:54 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <271020171648544945%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <gd47vchqb9q66h9dtrqi8ej4452s6tpnt1@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f8a2a237e12355e07a856bfb8b92a25a";
logging-data="5810"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18DCj+WHaEhZnqPqmY8yEHV"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kNZiyvWXkd6sEIGWtw8mHh05ZMI=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<gd47vchqb9q66h9dtrqi8ej4452s6tpnt1@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens<eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:

> ... except that I don't believe the claim about phototoshop. Well,
> maybe they haven't touched them with Photoshop but in most cases I
> believe they have been touched with something else.
>
> http://giggag.com/post/32161

photoshopping an image has come to mean retouch, regardless of app
used, just like googling something means search even if someone uses
bing. 

> The point to me is that apart from anything else, they all are of
> interesting subjects.

and well done. 

	
From: Bill W <nothing@nowhere.com>
Subject: Re: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill W <nothing@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:00:25 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <9e77vcpr1v64cqr6msme1pa3614a466rcr@4ax.com>
References: <gd47vchqb9q66h9dtrqi8ej4452s6tpnt1@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3c61b0adeb09a8250950b4d05c1693ab";
logging-data="9300"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19SfHCmik/YPcP56o9CsFch1D/e6CxfcR8="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 171027-2, 10/27/2017), Outbound message
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xtfXY366plkzSTaUDITBE4cmvs8=
Print Article
Forward Article
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 09:11:23 +1300, Eric Stevens<eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:

>... except that I don't believe the claim about phototoshop. Well,
>maybe they haven't touched them with Photoshop but in most cases I
>believe they have been touched with something else.

The claim is that they are "completely unedited". I guess that depends
on the definition of "edit" they chose. I guess it's possible, but not
even a little exposure tweaking? 

>http://giggag.com/post/32161
>
>The point to me is that apart from anything else, they all are of
>interesting subjects. 

	
From: Old Geezerr <dpspahr@cox.net>
Subject: Re: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx13.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Old Geezerr <dpspahr@cox.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
Message-ID: <2p18vcdclatd4njbmmc0s5prba0cop4nhe@4ax.com>
References: <gd47vchqb9q66h9dtrqi8ej4452s6tpnt1@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.00.32.1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 21
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 21:28:34 -0700
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2086774483
X-Received-Bytes: 1442
Print Article
Forward Article
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 09:11:23 +1300, Eric Stevens<eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:

>... except that I don't believe the claim about phototoshop. Well,
>maybe they haven't touched them with Photoshop but in most cases I
>believe they have been touched with something else.
>
>http://giggag.com/post/32161
>
>The point to me is that apart from anything else, they all are of
>interesting subjects.

 The picture of the splash inside of a bubble is probably a 
 1 in a million shot.

Dave:

 There goes the happy moron.
 He doesn't give a damn.
 Gee I wish I was a moron.
 My God, maybe I am 

	
Next <
From: Noons <wizofoz2k@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Noons <wizofoz2k@yahoo.com.au>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 20:13:57 +1100
Organization: NOYB
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <ot464m$fb6$1@dont-email.me>
References: <gd47vchqb9q66h9dtrqi8ej4452s6tpnt1@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:13:58 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4b4aa3272ff0d211e75ab0c2c0a0e515";
logging-data="15718"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+qh0DSX1euRY739OhFU49o"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.3.0
In-Reply-To: <gd47vchqb9q66h9dtrqi8ej4452s6tpnt1@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:B37BWjtwcUzeUTDEu2iIc+9N46k=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 28/10/2017 7:11 @wiz, Eric Stevens wrote:

> ... except that I don't believe the claim about phototoshop. Well,
> maybe they haven't touched them with Photoshop but in most cases I
> believe they have been touched with something else.

Definitely.  There are at least 2 images that have clearly been 
"touched" to control the highlights and shadows and make them more equal 
(poor man's HDR?).