> Prev
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: So this crap wont work with larger sensors?
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.3.7 with SMTP id 7mr11648747qkd.29.1509267538616;
Sun, 29 Oct 2017 01:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.31.153.21 with SMTP id b21mr1268565vke.13.1509267538547;
Sun, 29 Oct 2017 01:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!k31no4660797qta.1!news-out.google.com!r5ni4548qtc.1!nntp.google.com!k31no4660796qta.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 01:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.94.53.229; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.94.53.229
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ca01ee77-c861-4d95-92b8-299f643852cc@googlegroups.com>
Subject: So this crap wont work with larger sensors?
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 08:58:58 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 1
Print Article
Forward Article
The company has a vague claim that phone sensors are only "25% efficient" whatever that means.
https://www.dpreview.com/news/2117719553/invisage-reportedly-acquire... 

	
From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: So this crap wont work with larger sensors?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: android <here@there.was>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: So this crap wont work with larger sensors?
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 10:11:40 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <here-E4C2DF.10114029102017@news.individual.net>
References: <ca01ee77-c861-4d95-92b8-299f643852cc@googlegroups.com>
X-Trace: individual.net t9XtsjfDsvdtdGJsIAvIbAPHyCpL7sB2R5vXibwMAHy/6kZe2S
X-Orig-Path: here
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MTSMJZCo3zzZXwsJL5Ubi5teYgE=
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X)
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<ca01ee77-c861-4d95-92b8-299f643852cc@googlegroups.com>,
 RichA<rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

> The company has a vague claim that phone sensors are only "25% efficient" 
> whatever that means.
> https://www.dpreview.com/news/2117719553/invisage-reportedly-acquire...

Seems like this firm has been trying to reverse engineer and rewrite BSI 
to avoid licens and prestige loss... It must eat APPL to the core to 
have to use Sony tech in their iPhone cams...
-- 
teleportation kills 

	
Next <
From: Rich A <rander3127@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: So this crap wont work with larger sensors?
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.23.115 with SMTP id u48mr28272321qtk.12.1509348010589;
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.31.165.204 with SMTP id o195mr1527129vke.4.1509348010558;
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!z50no5322406qtj.0!news-out.google.com!r5ni5757qtc.1!nntp.google.com!k31no5338286qta.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <here-E4C2DF.10114029102017@news.individual.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.94.53.229; posting-account=mgMFTQoAAAA7JuQcTxBDpNp0J46ohxME
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.94.53.229
References: <ca01ee77-c861-4d95-92b8-299f643852cc@googlegroups.com> <here-E4C2DF.10114029102017@news.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d3e93f8b-c313-480c-b9ac-31a8102c935b@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: So this crap wont work with larger sensors?
From: Rich A <rander3127@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 07:20:10 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 14
Print Article
Forward Article
On Sunday, October 29, 2017 at 2:11:45 AM UTC-7, android wrote:
> In article<ca01ee77-c861-4d95-92b8-299f643852cc@googlegroups.com>,
>  RichA<rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > The company has a vague claim that phone sensors are only "25% efficient" 
> > whatever that means.
> > https://www.dpreview.com/news/2117719553/invisage-reportedly-acquire...
> 
> Seems like this firm has been trying to reverse engineer and rewrite BSI 
> to avoid licens and prestige loss... It must eat APPL to the core to 
> have to use Sony tech in their iPhone cams...
> -- 
> teleportation kills

Sony used to be the same way about alien tech in their stuff.