> Prev
From: Rich A <rander3127@gmail.com>
Subject: Dollar store-looking $129.00 video glasses fail to attract buyers
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.181.5 with SMTP id e5mr1804915qkf.57.1510152993261;
Wed, 08 Nov 2017 06:56:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.96.146 with SMTP id u140mr204081vkb.2.1510152993070; Wed,
08 Nov 2017 06:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!z50no126913qtj.0!news-out.google.com!r5ni436qtc.1!nntp.google.com!z50no126908qtj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 06:56:32 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.95.1.163; posting-account=mgMFTQoAAAA7JuQcTxBDpNp0J46ohxME
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.95.1.163
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <73538a1f-50c3-4b86-ba8d-8f0b5bd1f62f@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Dollar store-looking $129.00 video glasses fail to attract buyers
From: Rich A <rander3127@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 14:56:33 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 1
Print Article
Forward Article
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41915068 

	
From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Dollar store-looking $129.00 video glasses fail to attract buyers
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.27.100 with SMTP id p33mr1927527qtk.61.1510157034069;
Wed, 08 Nov 2017 08:03:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.50.18 with SMTP id y18mr222590vky.6.1510157033855; Wed,
08 Nov 2017 08:03:53 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!z50no130908qtj.0!news-out.google.com!r5ni436qtc.1!nntp.google.com!z50no130905qtj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 08:03:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <73538a1f-50c3-4b86-ba8d-8f0b5bd1f62f@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.37.90.65; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.37.90.65
References: <73538a1f-50c3-4b86-ba8d-8f0b5bd1f62f@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c542f76e-357d-440f-aa69-0ed89f74186e@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Dollar store-looking $129.00 video glasses fail to attract buyers
From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 16:03:54 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 8
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 14:56:37 UTC, Rich A  wrote:
> http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41915068

I think it's a bit unfair and I think they may have sold many more if people could actually order
them rather than having to find a vending machine, how many vending machines were in  London I don;t
remmebr seeing any, and even if I did I wouldn't be puttung $129 in one just to try something out.
I wouldn't even buy a chocolate bar from one as I know it'd be more expensive than going to a shop. 

	
From: Rich A <rander3127@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Dollar store-looking $129.00 video glasses fail to attract buyers
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.110.67 with SMTP id j64mr6171824qkc.4.1510283440765;
Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:10:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.131.145 with SMTP id f139mr589466vkd.11.1510283440679;
Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:10:40 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!q33no79520qta.0!news-out.google.com!v14ni1177qtc.0!nntp.google.com!u20no398244qtu.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 19:10:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <c542f76e-357d-440f-aa69-0ed89f74186e@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.95.1.163; posting-account=mgMFTQoAAAA7JuQcTxBDpNp0J46ohxME
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.95.1.163
References: <73538a1f-50c3-4b86-ba8d-8f0b5bd1f62f@googlegroups.com> <c542f76e-357d-440f-aa69-0ed89f74186e@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <57b4587d-1534-4be3-8e8f-1f750f09405f@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Dollar store-looking $129.00 video glasses fail to attract buyers
From: Rich A <rander3127@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 03:10:40 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 12
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wednesday, November 8, 2017 at 11:03:57 AM UTC-5, Whisky-dave wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 14:56:37 UTC, Rich A  wrote:
> > http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41915068
> 
> I think it's a bit unfair and I think they may have sold many more if people could actually order
them rather than having to find a vending machine, how many vending machines were in  London I don;t
remmebr seeing any, and even if I did I wouldn't be puttung $129 in one just to try something out.
> I wouldn't even buy a chocolate bar from one as I know it'd be more expensive than going to a shop.

Someone should stop putting the reigns of marketing into 20-something Millenial D.B.s who really
have NO real experience.  Hence, "vending machines." 

	
From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: Dollar store-looking $129.00 video glasses fail to attract buyers
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: android <here@there.was>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Dollar store-looking $129.00 video glasses fail to attract buyers
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 05:28:23 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <here-0A194B.05282310112017@news.individual.net>
References: <73538a1f-50c3-4b86-ba8d-8f0b5bd1f62f@googlegroups.com> <c542f76e-357d-440f-aa69-0ed89f74186e@googlegroups.com> <57b4587d-1534-4be3-8e8f-1f750f09405f@googlegroups.com>
X-Trace: individual.net Tw2s5L0bLSfWXLvR3NiMXQqyR12qUvZr6EDHM8NrvM8Tdn143l
X-Orig-Path: here
Cancel-Lock: sha1:X2d43eNWZByZdPYwAbK3bxtuIzg=
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X)
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<57b4587d-1534-4be3-8e8f-1f750f09405f@googlegroups.com>,
 Rich A<rander3127@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, November 8, 2017 at 11:03:57 AM UTC-5, Whisky-dave wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 14:56:37 UTC, Rich A  wrote:
> > > http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41915068
> > 
> > I think it's a bit unfair and I think they may have sold many more if 
> > people could actually order them rather than having to find a vending 
> > machine, how many vending machines were in  London I don;t remmebr seeing 
> > any, and even if I did I wouldn't be puttung $129 in one just to try 
> > something out.
> > I wouldn't even buy a chocolate bar from one as I know it'd be more 
> > expensive than going to a shop.
> 
> Someone should stop putting the reigns of marketing into 20-something 
> Millenial D.B.s who really have NO real experience.  Hence, "vending 
> machines."

These things do that what people expect Goog Glass to do, at least on 
occasion.  Looks glasses but double as surveillance cameras but you 
don't know if they are on. They should put a red "action" lamp on them! 
I doubt that they makes you more popular at the club/pub than the Goog 
Glasses...

Look what a spectacle that makes of himself. Freak show!

<https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/images/ic/720x405/p054pmbf.jpg>
-- 
teleportation kills 

	
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Dollar store-looking $129.00 video glasses fail to attract buyers
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Dollar store-looking $129.00 video glasses fail to attract buyers
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 23:44:23 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <091120172344239333%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <73538a1f-50c3-4b86-ba8d-8f0b5bd1f62f@googlegroups.com> <c542f76e-357d-440f-aa69-0ed89f74186e@googlegroups.com> <57b4587d-1534-4be3-8e8f-1f750f09405f@googlegroups.com> <here-0A194B.05282310112017@news.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6ad62534e6d6028206c767376f795607";
logging-data="26114"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+aMx3OBRew8YPKyOGKqpXv"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SMoR/kWSyQpHkmmN9TbqdbiLVcQ=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<here-0A194B.05282310112017@news.individual.net>, android<here@there.was> wrote:

> Looks glasses but double as surveillance cameras but you 
> don't know if they are on. They should put a red "action" lamp on them! 

they did, but it's white.

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lkDyH53H4I&t=44> 

	
Next <
From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: Dollar store-looking $129.00 video glasses fail to attract buyers
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: android <here@there.was>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Dollar store-looking $129.00 video glasses fail to attract buyers
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:08:18 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <here-9F6E7F.08081810112017@news.individual.net>
References: <73538a1f-50c3-4b86-ba8d-8f0b5bd1f62f@googlegroups.com> <c542f76e-357d-440f-aa69-0ed89f74186e@googlegroups.com> <57b4587d-1534-4be3-8e8f-1f750f09405f@googlegroups.com> <here-0A194B.05282310112017@news.individual.net> <091120172344239333%nospam@nospam.invalid>
X-Trace: individual.net nRC+habVLZHeMnWhfJ1/gQz9TlVF88nVcnuJGyFIp48jiUXgnl
X-Orig-Path: here
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RnDHCp/i2HJvhwdfOwDOf0QkcyA=
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X)
Print Article
Forward Article
In article <091120172344239333%nospam@nospam.invalid>,
 nospam<nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> In article<here-0A194B.05282310112017@news.individual.net>, android
><here@there.was> wrote:
> 
> > Looks glasses but double as surveillance cameras but you 
> > don't know if they are on. They should put a red "action" lamp on them! 
> 
> they did, but it's white.
> 
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lkDyH53H4I&t=44>

That just makes them look like a party gimmick. Elton style! Don't 
count...
-- 
teleportation kills