> Prev
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: DXO credibility should be called into question
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.3.79 with SMTP id w15mr854456qtg.10.1511917862355;
Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:11:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.41.81 with SMTP id p78mr56330vkp.2.1511917862097; Tue, 28
Nov 2017 17:11:02 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!g35no22945qtk.1!news-out.google.com!v55ni17qtc.0!nntp.google.com!m31no23365qtf.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:11:01 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=184.75.212.59;
posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.75.212.59
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <af44278c-01c7-41bc-be6a-b16f0065c975@googlegroups.com>
Subject: DXO credibility should be called into question
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 01:11:02 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1210
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3500960270
Print Article
Forward Article
Nikon's D850 loses by a substantial (their) margin to a SONY for "sports?!!"  What does "sports"
mean to DXO, a still-life studio scene??

https://petapixel.com/2017/11/28/sony-a7r-iii-scores-100-dxomark-hig... 

	
Next <
From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: DXO credibility should be called into question
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: android <here@there.was>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: DXO credibility should be called into question
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 06:51:03 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <f87067FdnfqU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <af44278c-01c7-41bc-be6a-b16f0065c975@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net U0JWIgeANx9cazqP/Kab/QsAXZXa1My+tfDn7t/kXqK7NDoeqc
Cancel-Lock: sha1:i2QajDf5uXK2P6E3JjqoIaoWo6Y=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
In-Reply-To: <af44278c-01c7-41bc-be6a-b16f0065c975@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Print Article
Forward Article
On  2017-11-29 02:11, RichA wrote:
> Nikon's D850 loses by a substantial (their) margin to a SONY for "sports?!!"  What does "sports"
mean to DXO, a still-life studio scene??
> 
Nahh... You should look at the data not the scores. Click the 
measurement tab and you'll find that Canon humiliates both Nikon and 
Sony on noise:

<https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Sony-A7R-III-ve...

<http://tinyurl.com/y7q22hkt>

If you just want a set of numbers:

<http://www.senscore.org/>
-- 
teleportation kills