> Prev
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: The viewfinder optics. Something mirrorless users should be aware of
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.200.218 with SMTP id t87mr17943322qkl.30.1514249293816;
Mon, 25 Dec 2017 16:48:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.2.144 with SMTP id 138mr2201959vkc.5.1514249293628; Mon,
25 Dec 2017 16:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!g35no1927948qtk.1!news-out.google.com!t48ni664qtc.1!nntp.google.com!g35no1927947qtk.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 16:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.95.0.172; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.95.0.172
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e0a29717-c5cc-49cc-b7f7-cc15a5eac885@googlegroups.com>
Subject: The viewfinder optics. Something mirrorless users should be aware of
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:48:13 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1169
X-Received-Body-CRC: 133527039
Print Article
Forward Article
I bought the first mirrorless (Panasonic G1) when it came out.  Even though it has a low-resolution
(460,000) EVF compared to modern cameras, it was never hard to focus b 

	
Next <
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: The viewfinder optics. Something mirrorless users should beaware of
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.42.150 with SMTP id q22mr17696764qkq.11.1514249760335;
Mon, 25 Dec 2017 16:56:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.158.84 with SMTP id h81mr2211109vke.6.1514249760089; Mon,
25 Dec 2017 16:56:00 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.unit0.net!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!m31no1926215qtf.0!news-out.google.com!t48ni664qtc.1!nntp.google.com!g35no1929392qtk.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 16:55:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e0a29717-c5cc-49cc-b7f7-cc15a5eac885@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.95.0.172; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.95.0.172
References: <e0a29717-c5cc-49cc-b7f7-cc15a5eac885@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <015aad0c-2b4b-4c7e-a996-7d5eccb8b47a@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The viewfinder optics. Something mirrorless users should be
aware of
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:56:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1164868903
X-Received-Bytes: 2384
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, 25 December 2017 19:48:20 UTC-5, RichA  wrote:
> I bought the first mirrorless (Panasonic G1) when it came out.  Even though it has a
low-resolution (460,000) EVF compared to modern cameras, it was never hard to focus because the
viewfinder optics were very sharp.  Fast-forward to the Olympus E-M5 which I dumped it for the
E-M5II as soon as the II was out, almost solely because of the poor viewfinder optical quality.  I
was never able to see a clearly-defined image compared to the lowly G1 viewfinder despite the E-M5's
resolution advantage.  That's the difference between resolution and sharpness.  The Panasonic GX8
has a fantastic viewfinder, high resolution, sharp and one of the largest in mirrorless.  A older
Sony NEX-7 I have has a decent viewfinder, but it's not in the league of the GX8 or E-M5II.  Read
the account below and you'll see why sheer resolution doesn't always mean a clear view.  I honestly
wish mfg's wouldn't skimp on the optics of the viewfinder.

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60549465